The Division of Audit (DoA, or The Division) provides independent, objective assurance and consulting services
designed to add value and improve the University’s operations. It helps the University
accomplish its objectives by bringing a systematic, disciplined approach to evaluate
and improve the effectiveness of risk management, control, and governance processes.
The Division serves as a proactive business partner with University management by
evaluating business processes, controls, compliance mechanisms and technologies to
ensure:
View the Board of Trustees Audit and Compliance Committee Charter
Approved September 12, 2024
The authority and responsibilities of the Florida Agricultural and Mechanical University’s
(FAMU) Division of Audit (DoA/Division) are defined in this charter.
DoA is led by the Vice President for Audit who serves as the University’s Chief Audit
Executive\Inspector General and the Director of Audit.
The Division is committed to enhancing FAMU’s ability to serve the public interest
and its reputation and credibility with its stakeholders. DoA enhances and protects
organizational value by providing risk-based and objective audits and consulting engagements;
and investigating instances of fraud, waste, and abuse as follows:
DoA provides insight on the mitigation of strategic, performance, and business risk
to assist the Board of Trustees (BOT) and University management in the effective discharge
of their responsibilities as they relate to the University policies, processes, programs,
information
systems, internal controls, and management reporting. DoA is a point of coordination
of and responsibility for activities that promote accountability, integrity, and efficiency
in university operations.
DoA’s mission is to enhance and protect the value of FAMU and its stakeholders by
providing excellence in risk-based and objective assurance, advice, and insight through
the
promotion of accountability, integrity, and efficiency.
Audit and consulting activities will conform to the International Professional Practices Framework published by the Institute of Internal Auditors, Inc. and/or the Information Systems Auditing Standards published by ISACA. DoA shall uphold the principles of integrity, objectivity, confidentiality, and competency as defined in the Institute of lnternal Auditors' Code of Ethics. DoA is to utilize the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations (COSO) as the model for evaluating the adequacy of internal controls. Additionally, the Division will adhere to the University's regulations, the Division's standard operating procedures manual, and Florida Board of Governors regulations and standards.
Investigation activities will conform to standards found in the Principles and Standards for Offices of Inspector General published by the Association of Inspectors General, and professional standards issued for the State University System of Florida entitled Standards for Complaint Handling and Investigations for the State University System of Florida.
The Chief Audit Executive will report periodically to the BOT and senior management regarding the internal audit function’s conformance with these standards.
DoA provides audit and investigative services to all entities of FAMU, including schools,
colleges, administrative departments, auxiliary enterprises, and direct support organizations.
Accordingly, the Division is authorized to:
The Vice President of the Division of Audit serves as the University’s Chief Audit
Executive, as
described in the International Standards for the Professional Practice of Internal
Auditing, and
as Inspector General as authorized in Section 112.3189(1), Florida Statutes. The Chief
Audit
Executive shall notify the chair of the BOT’s audit committee or the President, as
appropriate, of any unresolved restriction or barrier imposed by any individual on
the scope of an inquiry, or the failure to provide access to necessary information
or people for the purposes of such inquiry. The Chief Audit Executive shall work with
the BOT and university management to remedy scope or access limitations. If the university
is not able to remedy such limitations, the Chief Audit Executive shall timely notify
the Board of Governors, through the Office of Inspector General and Director of Compliance
(OIGC), of any such restriction, barrier, or limitation.
Circumstances may arise that necessitate a review or amendment of the Division’s charter. Such circumstances include, but are not limited to:
In such cases, the Chief Audit Executive, in consultation with the BOT and senior management, will discuss and document any required changes to the charter to ensure it continues to reflect the needs and objectives of the university.
Board Oversight: The BOT will actively participate in discussions with the Chief Audit
Executive and senior management to ensure that the Division has the necessary authority,
resources, and independence to fulfill its duties effectively. The BOT will review
and approve
the internal audit charter periodically to ensure that it remains aligned with the
university’s
strategic objectives and risk profile. The BOT will also ensure that the Chief Audit
Executive has direct and unrestricted access to the BOT, including the ability to
meet privately with the BOT without senior management present.
The Chief Audit Executive reports functionally to the Chair of the BOT and to the
Chair of the
BOT’s Audit, Risk and Compliance Committee, and therefore communicates and interacts
directly with the BOT, including at BOT meetings and between BOT meetings as appropriate.
The Chief Audit Executive reports administratively to the President of the University.
The BOT will:
The Chief Audit Executive shall report directly to the Chair of the BOT and Chair
of the BOT’s
Audit, Risk, and Compliance Committee any allegations about the University President.
Any
allegations related to the Chief Audit Executive shall be reported to the University
President and Chair of the BOT’s Audit, Risk, and Compliance Committee. Any allegations
against BOT members shall be reported to the Board of Governors. These allegations
are not to be handled internally and are not to be investigated by the Division.
The Chief Audit Executive will have the authority to disclose to the BOT any instances
of
interference encountered during the execution of internal audit activities. Such disclosures
will
include the nature of the interference, its impact on the internal audit function's
effectiveness, and any actions taken to mitigate its effects. The BOT will support
the Chief Audit Executive in
maintaining the independence and objectivity of the internal audit function, ensuring
that the
function can operate without undue influence from management.
The Division will remain free from interference by any element in the University,
including
matters of audit and investigation selection, scope, procedures, frequency, timing,
or report
content to permit maintenance of a necessary independent and objective mental attitude.
Division staff must have no personal and external impairments to their independence,
and have no direct responsibility or authority over any of the activities audited.
Accordingly, they will not implement internal controls, develop procedures, install
systems, prepare records, or engage in any other activity that may impair their judgment.
Division staff will exhibit the highest level of professional objectivity in gathering,
evaluating,
and communicating information about the activity or process being examined. Division
staff
will make a balanced assessment of all the relevant circumstances and not be unduly
influenced by their own interests or by others in forming judgments.
The Chief Audit Executive will confirm to the BOT, at least annually, the organizational
independence of the internal audit activity.
Responsibility
The scope of internal audit encompasses, but is not limited to, providing assurance
to
management by examining and evaluating of the adequacy and effectiveness of the university’s
governance, risk management, and internal controls as well as the quality of performance
in carrying out assigned responsibilities to achieve the University’s stated goals
and objectives.
Available Upon Request
We will be championed by our customers, benchmarked by our peers (counterparts), and dedicated to excellence in our products and services.
|
Accountability - Accountability is an obligation or willingness to accept responsibility or to account for one's actions |
Inclusion - Inclusion is the act of including; the state of being included; the act or practice of including and accommodating people who have historically been excluded (as because of their race, gender, sexuality, or ability) |
Innovation - Innovation is a new idea, method, or device. |
Integrity - Firm adherence to a code of especially moral or artistic values; incorruptibility; an unimpaired condition : soundness; the quality or state of being complete or undivided; completeness |
|
Efficiency - the quality or degree of being efficient; capable of producing desired results with little or no waste (as of time or materials) |
Objectivity - the quality or character of being objective; lack of favoritism toward one side or another; freedom from bias |
Confidentiality - the state of keeping or being kept secret or private |
Competency - possession of sufficient knowledge or skill |